ハサミスキルの評定方法の一つとして, 出来映えを"上手""下手"などとする主観的評価がある。今回, 主観的評価の判定基準とその信頼性について検討を行った。予備調査として,あらかじめ60名の幼児に切らせてあった曲線や円など6種類の線や形の資料を,独自に作成した5種類の評定法(3,4,5,6,7段階法)を用いて10名の評定者によって評定させた。予備調査の結果を参考にして, 評定法を4段階法と6段階法との2種類に絞って2次調査を行った。2次調査は32名の評定者によって, 評定者間および評価-再評価の一致率を検討した。同一資料に対する評定者間の評定の一致率は78.3%(SD13.14)p<.05であった。評価-再評価の一致率は79.1%であり相関はr=.958,p<.01であった。

We asked as many as sixty children to cut out six shapes for this study. We used a subjective evaluation for the "Scissors skill assessment". The works were judged as either "good" or "poor". We investigated the reliability of this subjective evaluation. At first, we asked ten judges to evaluate the children's works by using five different evaluation sheets we prepared in a preliminary investigation. These evaluations have respectively, three, four, five, six and seven ranking scales. Next, based on the result of the preliminary investigation, we then selected the four rank and the six rank scales as the instreliable. Then thirty-two judges evaluated the children's works with these two evaluations. We examined the rate of coincidence in rating between and within the judges. The coincidence rate in rating between the judges for the same works was 78% (SD13.14) p<.05. The coincidence rate in testretest for the judges was 0.943,p<.0001.

国立情報学研究所で電子化